In thinking
about Che Guevara, I first wondered why his image is even more powerful than it
was in his time of revolution. The two-part film, “Che”, then became my primary
source of research. I discovered that Che did free Cuba from a corrupted
government, although, he his dreams of freeing all of Latin America came to an
end in the defeat by the Bolivian Government.
Che witnessed
the structural violence that occurred in Latin America on his motorcycle
journey as a young man, and the violence still occurs today. He observed a
colonial world where the people’s human rights were violated and exploited by
the higher powers of American capitalists. Che’s vision of giving Latin
Americans came to an end, but Americans control over the lands has heightened.
Neo-Liberalism
or Post Fordism has granted open markets and deregulations to American
organization, such as NAFTA. Capitalist are free to develop industries all over
Latin America where they can exploit the natural resources, as well as the
slave labor that the locals depend on. Their exploitations create a monopoly
where the rich stay rich, and where the poor are forced to depend on sweatshop
wages.
Today,
capitalists buy their power in these vulnerable countries, and they sustain
their control with Latin “leadership” or bureaucracy. The economical power that
American capitalist contain transforms Latin social structures, which eliminates
the middle class, and destroys the livelihoods of the people that live in these
third world countries.
The exploitation
of the land and its people is one issue, but the torture, imprisonment, and
extermination of Latinos and Latinas becomes another problem, as capitalist try
to protect their power. Latinos can’t resist their government, or fight against
exploitation, or issues, such as industrial pollution, because the Latin
bureaucracy doesn’t tolerate resistance. The corrupted government has
demonstrated their power with the disappearances in Guatemala, and the Dirty
War of Buenos Aires where the army was responsible for 85% of civilian deaths.
The power that the oppressors take away every single ounce of autonomy and hope
that these third world people have, and they control them with economical,
social, and militaristic brutality.
In a world where
you contain no social, political, or economical autonomy, it is pretty obvious
why the rhetoric of Che’s image still lives today. The oppressed see an
intelligent and kind man who was ruthless towards his enemies, which is their
enemies as well. They see one of their own, who revolted against the corrupted
governments, and who successfully defeated the powerful. Che Guevara’s image becomes
more than a historical figure, but rather an image of resistance, and a sense
of autonomy, which gives the oppressed a sense of empowerment.
02/04/14-- Response Task: Comment on somebody's post.
ReplyDeleteThis post makes a really interesting read and I like how you refer to Che's legacy today in a way that implies the exploitation of his image for Capitalist Imperialistic ends.
Your discussion of the way that American Capitalists exploit the vulnerability of Latin American cultures helps me to think about my own research project in the way that it connects to Disney's representation of Latin America in "The Emperor's New Groove." The unnamed setting of the animation which is most likely Peru but could potentially be metonymic for the entirety of Latin America is represented as a place of oppression under the rule of Kuzco its despotic leader. Without ever overtly referring to America, Disney manages to create an "Us" and "Them" stance by contrasting Capitalist American values with the apparent repression of Latin American cultures. The outcome of the film shows the leader Kuzco learning from the virtuous peasants and reducing his autocracy to an American style democrasy. And so, without even needing to mention the USA or Latin America, Disney manages to imply that all the world would be better if it was just like North America.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMelisa Garcia
ReplyDeleteApril 9, 2014
540 Chicano Ecology
“The power that the oppressors take away every single ounce of autonomy and hope that these third world people have, and they control them with economical, social, and militaristic brutality.” –Joshua Garcia
This particular sentence was definitely super loaded for me. I thought about the word “oppressors”, as I’ve often found myself trying to dissect the ways this word is used. Then I thought about When the Mountains Tremble, the villages that were slaughtered, and this sense of entrapment they faced as their male breadwinners were laying on the porches of their homes. This image comes to life with this statement, especially when thinking about the “hope that these third world people have”. There hope is grounded on the basis of getting through each day. I easily can question, why my father came to America, why he didn’t stay in Guatemala, and I can simply answer through having knowledge of the political conflicts in Guatemala or Latin America that there is no other way around it. You flee to reach a hope unattainable in your own country. That to me, is something I can’t understand because through one person’s journey to this country, I have not participated or endured the control from a corrupt government.