After
this week's readings and film, I feel bad. I imagine that is kind of
the point. I imagine it would be quite strange for anyone to feel
anything less. After all, exploitation and murder are inherently
unsettling. On top of feeling unsettled, I am also rather frustrated.
I'm frustrated that there doesn't seem to be much I can do to effect
change. I want very badly to be able to do something, but so far I
feel that the monumental amount of change that would need to occur is
somehow beyond any actions I could aspire to.
So,
I wonder, what is one to do? Is it enough to focus energy and effort
on the betterment of one thing while ignoring so many other things?
Is it insanity to think that I, or anyone, could make that much of an
impact? Try typing “help Guatemala” into Google, you'll get
“299,000,000 results” in less than a second. The first four pages
give results that range from animal welfare charities to every
religious sect you could imagine getting involved. Likewise, numerous big aid and
charity groups are involved in the region as well. It looks like
there are countless ways to try to effect change, but none that hold
much promise for big impacts in the near future.
Over
and over it seems clear that the problem is systemic, it is the
Western way of life. Our trade relations with other countries have
been and continue to be destructive. While “fair trade”
initiatives are a desirable have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too kind of
solution, they too are gaining ground slowly. The reason for slow
moving progress might be simple. It may be that we are struggling
with uncomfortable solutions to the uncomfortable reality of global
trade. Many such solutions are plainly un-American: eating less beef,
driving less, consuming less, paying more for goods,
contemplating/researching purchases, etc.
The
unsettling feeling from the documentary and texts seems like a
feeling that will need to be held on to for some time, not something
that can be quickly sloughed off with some minor change or quick fix.
Likewise, this feeling seems to be something that needs to be shared
with others. Embarking on a journey to be better citizens of our
global economy isn't something that we can do alone, it requires
communal effort. For such communal effort we need to take stock of
how we shape our rhetoric as we share our discoveries and
understanding of the externalities of our ways of life. If we take our
unsettled feelings and share them with others, perhaps over time more
people will look to ethically oriented economic and environmental
business models.
Maybe
someday we will look back to the out-sourced slavery that has
prevailed in our lifetimes as something just as barbaric and
backwards as the slavery that we cultivated throughout the South some
two hundred years ago. Maybe two hundred years from now, these sorts
of labor practices will seem just as unimaginable as “owning”
another human being.
ReplyDeleteI think, as we discussed in class last week, a counter to this kind of despair that Mike feels is evident in his conclusion. As Mike points out, we have come a huge way in just two hundred years, so what is to say the next two hundred can’t be even more productive? We are living in a time in which information can be spread almost instantaneously, I feel like for all the time consuming and potentially negative effects of the internet and sites like facebook, this freedom to disseminate information rapidly can also be a positive resource for making change. Furthermore, the idea expressed in Ch 5 of Pathologies in which Farmer advocates community action, small deeds rather than one giant globally reaching solution for world poverty, may also be a way forward. Since, if everybody were to attempt to effect some sort of positive change, even if it is small on its own, the results would still be global.